Tuesday, March 12, 2013
Mental Health Public Safety
In the weeks since the mass murders in
Newtown, Conn., many voices have articulated
theories as to the “how” and “why” of
this particular mass murder, and the preventative
steps that can be taken to avoid future atrocities.
In addition to the calls for a renewed federal ban on so-called
assault weapons and tighter restrictions on firearms purchases,
there have been productive discussions concerning
mental health. I believe that addressing the issue of
mental health care – and ensuring access to services by
families of the mentally ill – is the overarching component
in preventing mass killings in schools, the workplace and
the family home.
I recently came across a report about Laura’s Law, named
for Laura Wilcox, a 19-year-old college student who was
murdered in 2000 by a man who suffered from late-onset
schizophrenia. She was shot four times at point-blank
range while she worked as a volunteer at a mental hospital
during Christmas break. Passed by the State of California
in 2002, Laura’s Law was designed to provide housing
and treatment for dangerous mentally ill persons reluctant
to seek help. Under Laura’s Law, a judge can order outpatient
treatment for up to six months for a seriously mentally
ill individual proven likely to pose a danger either to
himself or others. The process can be initiated by family
members, social workers or the police.
The irony is that despite having been passed into law
more than a decade ago, Laura’s Law has been effectively
nullified, through lack of funding, in nearly all but two
counties in the state. Nevada County, where Laura Wilcox
had lived, is the only county in the state where Laura’s
Law has been used as an instrument of the court in 54
cases. Los Angeles County has recently begun a smaller
pilot program based on Laura’s Law.
Critics of involuntary treatment say the process takes way
the rights and dignity of the individual. This argument has
been at the core of opposition to Laura’s Law and similar
measures throughout the US. The public is hesitant to
empower the State with the ability to force citizens into
care too swiftly. The image of the State Hospital runamuck
with corruption and unchecked powers is an
indelible one. No one wants a return to the dark days of
mental health care and all of the ghastly images that era
conjures.
Despite this understandable reluctance, I believe we
must acknowledge that the current voluntary care system
does not meet the public safety needs of modern society
– a point proven all too well by the cases of Jared
Loughner, James Holmes, Adam Lanza and too many
others to name. To effectively take control of public safety,
the State must have the ability to step in and administer
care when necessary for the severely ill who have long
refused treatment and are likely pose a threat to themselves
or others.
To learn more about Laura's Law, you can visit the website
www.mentalillnesspolicy.org.org. To encourage Los
Angeles County to continue and expand the Laura's Law
pilot program, please contact Los Angeles County
Supervisor Gloria Molina's office at molina.lacounty.gov.
DW
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment